×

Warning message

The installed version of the browser you are using is outdated and no longer supported by Konveio. Please upgrade your browser to the latest release.

IBCS Standards 2.0 (clean draft)

Please add your comments until Jan 31, 2026

Use this document version if your prefer commenting on a clean draft.

File name:

-

File size:

-

Title:

-

Author:

-

Subject:

-

Keywords:

-

Creation Date:

-

Modification Date:

-

Creator:

-

PDF Producer:

-

PDF Version:

-

Page Count:

-

Page Size:

-

Fast Web View:

-

Choose an option Alt text (alternative text) helps when people can’t see the image or when it doesn’t load.
Aim for 1-2 sentences that describe the subject, setting, or actions.
This is used for ornamental images, like borders or watermarks.
Preparing document for printing…
0%

Click anywhere in the document to add a comment. Select a bubble to view comments.

Document is loading Loading Glossary…
Powered by Konveio

Comments

View all Cancel

Add comment


Suggestion
Why not similar to ranking: text and symbol in the title: like product name and a simplified symbol for filter such as:
- Stacked lines: It typically looks like three horizontal lines of varying lengths (often short, medium, long)
- A small inverted triangle symbol â–Ľ
Suggestion
(1) In many vizzes, a darker shade of a color stands for higher number. E.g., dark blue for high revenues and lighter blue shades for lower revenues. Could be more intuitive when a darker shade is for higher amount of a KPI. The standard here that darker means undesirable and lighter is more desirable is maybe confusing for many people because often the standard is: darker means more of something. why not darker shade for a higher amount, independing of this is desirable or not. I.e., darker for higher revenues as well as for higher costs.
(2) This can be seen with color gradients. darker green for high positive deviation, light green for low positive deviation, light red for low negative and dark red for high negative deviation, with many shades in beetween.
You could also adress gradient colors. Color gradients should be used rarely, because it is unclear which color shade stands for which value. Even with a legend, only the tendency is visible, so not for precise messages. A use case could be a heatmap where a lot of data is used and it is not about precision but rather an overview and identifying some hotspots. Less colors, e.g. only green and red for variances, is clearer. This is maybe the reason why you exclude yellow for small variances. Problem is to define what small means.
Suggestion
Another exception is experience curve concept (sinking costs by a constant percentage with increasing production over time), if you want to mention this.
Suggestion
Bars are so great because they start at the same point (x=0), therefore even minimal differences between the bars are recognizable (as opposed to pie charts). This advantage disappears when the bars are stacked. The lighter grey bars are difficult to compare because starting points differ. I would prefer this here when an overview is important to compare all cities with the product breakdown. Alternatively, 2 bar charts: one per city and one per product which can be filtered by city.
Suggestion
1) usually, rel. market share is on x-axis. we read from left to right, from top to bottom - this leads to the phases in the product lifecycle - question marks, stars, cash cows, dogs. here it starts top left with cash cows. No reason is mentioned why not applying the standard for portfolio visualizations.
2) the threshold lines for low and high growth & share could be more noticeable/ clearer (similar to tips for zero-lines from somewhere else in this document). Defining those limits are a very important part of portfolio analysis, which should be highlighted.
Suggestion
maybe, there should be more lines in the chart left, making it clearer that it can be confusing. With a filter option, this issue can be solved. You user then can select how many lines still make sense. There is the advantage that many lines in one chart show correlations better. A true spaghetti with too many lines is to be avoided, of course. Maybe a comment in the title (with the message of the purpose of the chart - that only few lines should be compared) in combination with a filter, is a good option to show correlations between lines which increase information density.
Suggestion
There is a mistake in the KPI tree. Return is always a relative figure, defined as profit divided by a reference figure. So, what you should have here is a profitability figure: e.g., operating profit. DuPont/ROI system uses Earnings. Then it works: Dividing Earnings by Sales provides Sales Return.
Question
Shouldn't all Certified Consultants (ICC) be listed here?
If yes, please add:
Matthias Giger
Raphael Kempf
Cornelius Knall
Suggestion
Explain how these guidelines relate to WCAG. WCAG stands for Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, an internationally recognized standard developed by the World Wide Web Consortium (W3C). The goal is to make websites and digital content accessible to everyone, including people with disabilities (visual, auditory, motor, or cognitive impairments).
Suggestion
using {G, M, k} for {Giga, Mega, kilo} can be irritating, so some more explanation on this occasion would be helpful
Question
cf. S1, sounds to me pretty much the same, doesn't it?
Suggestion
Consider to distinguish between "time interval dimension" (a time range with defined start and end, e.g. April becomes April 01 to April 30) and "time dimension" (a point in time, e.g. April, which could be the month or the last day of the month in financial reporting)
Suggestion
For the sake of emphasis, cut "complicated" from the sentence. Even if a visualization is not overly complicated, it still can benefit from being simplified.
Suggestion
Cut "PowerPoint". Though it's the most commonly used software to produce slides, it's defnitiely not the only one out there.
Suggestion
add "location" as an example since it's more widely applicable.
Suggestion
"Posted" is obsolete and can be removed. This would create a more dense description and removes ambiguity.
One could imagine the questions "What is the meaning of 'posted`?" or "Are there other applications of visuals?"
Suggestion
I'd suggest to clarify that this applies also to "one screen", i.e.: there should not be the necessity to scroll down or flip a page.
Suggestion
have been adopted by ISO 24896
in reply to Frank's comment
Suggestion
In data analytics professions, the term measure dimension makes sense. I could not think of a better term to be honest.
Question
Is detail a verb and this a complete sentence?
Suggestion
I rarely heard about data compilations, isn't just "data" enough?
in reply to Matthias Giger's comment
Suggestion
I would prefer "meaningful" instead of creative
Suggestion
have been adopted by ISO 24896
Suggestion
A way around showing too many categories at once is to offer a parameter for the end user so she or he can switch between the categories. This is possible with most modern BI Tools such as SAC, Power BI and Tableau.
Question
a project, etc., or combinations thereof
a comma before 'or'?
Suggestion
has been adopted by ISO 24896
Suggestion
... vertical space, especially on pages ...
a comma would ease comprehension
Suggestion
at the top of the page or screen
Suggestion
the position and the layout are always...
Suggestion
no comma needed here
Suggestion
every kind of text component.
'every kind of' requires a singular
Question
Typo?
Question
Is this a narrow blank space?
in reply to Mala Deep Upadhaya 1 1 1 1 1 1 1's comment
Suggestion
I would omit cognitive load. While it is a well know term in data visualization, it's not that well commonly understood.
in reply to Dr. Jan Seifert's comment
Question
I am not sure if I understand you correctly. Could it be that you describe the function of thresholds, average lines, etc...? That would be a dedicated feature of many BI-platforms usually referred to as reference lines.
in reply to Mario's comment
Suggestion
I'd say if it has a function to support it conveys meaning too. However I would rather use whitespace and alignment to structure things. White space and alignment use less cognitive processing power to percept.
Question
I am not sure. If the animation is on the single most important data point, it can help to draw the attention there. If it can be done with a less attention consuming encoding, animations shall not be used though. Animation on side elements are secure indicators of bad design choices or attempts to hide the lack of strong content.
I am not sure, if this thought can be conveyed here in a simple and short manner.
Question
Do the shades of grey convey a different meaning?
Question
This has been mentioned already. Is the repetition intended?
Suggestion
business instead of finance?
Suggestion
better and faster decision-making....
I suggest to add faster as a second advantage
in reply to Matthias Giger's comment
Suggestion
Analysts distinguishes heavily between dimensions and measures. Measures can be aggregated and are typically continuous (metric), dimensions can be grouped and are typically discrete (nominal, ordinal).
Maybe 'measures dimensions' is more accurate. Examples for measure dimensions are Sales vs Profit or more granular, Gross Profit, EBIT, EBITDA, EBT, Net Profit
Suggestion
Measures can overlap. And there are business reasons to use measures that overlap. If mentioning measures as an example here is important for a later context, I don't mind. If not, I suggest not to use them here as an example.
Suggestion
I suggest to rephrase:
... and annotations. General components are not used for the construction of visuals but are necessary for the comprehension of visuals and entire pages.
This way it is clear that not used for the construction references to General components. Plus, the sentence is shorter.
in reply to Frank's comment
Suggestion
Frank, I agree that Clarify is more accurate. However, the SUCCESS Formula has done a great job of sticking in the heads and therefore I would not recommend to change that SUCCESS formula.
Suggestion
Now I understand why you added the adjective in the introduction as a reference to this thoughts.
I would suggest to take it out in the introduction as there is causes more confusion and here it is well explained.
in reply to Matthias Giger's comment
Suggestion
Maybe also mention shortly the difference target audience.
Suggestion
I suggest to point out the difference between the ISO 24896 and IBCS principles more clearly and in simpler words. I doubt that readers immediately understand that IBCS is much richer than ISO 24896 and that ISO is more condensed.
Question
Isn't the term 'Nonprofit' more commonly used?
Question
What is the intention to use the adjective 'creative' here?